“Conceptual Frameworks and Research Models on Resilience in Leadership” by Jesse Ledesma

7-2014

Abstract

The objective of this short article ended up being to discuss conceptual frameworks and research models on resilience theory. The constructs of resilience, a brief history of resilience theory, types of resilience, variables of resilience, career resilience, and business resilience is going to be examined and discussed because they connect with leadership development. The literature shows that there’s an immediate relationship between your stress from the leader’s job and their capability to maintain resilience when confronted with prolonged connection with adversity. This short article discusses resilience theory as it requires leadership development. The idea connected with resilience, including thriving and hardiness, is explored with the fact that resilient leaders are invaluable towards the sustainability of the organization. Additionally, the constructs of resilience and also the good reputation for resilience studies in the area of psychiatry, developmental psychopathy, human development, medicine, epidemiology, and also the social sciences are examined. Survival, recovery, and thriving are concepts connected with resilience and describe happens where you might be during or after facing adversity. The idea of “;thriving” describes an individual’s capability to exceed their original degree of functioning and also to grow and performance despite repeated contact with demanding encounters. The literature suggests numerous variables that characterize resilience and thriving. These variables include positive self-esteem, hardiness, strong coping skills, a feeling of coherence, self-effectiveness, optimism, strong social sources, adaptability, risk-taking, low anxiety about failure, determination, perseverance, along with a high tolerance of uncertainty. They are reviewed in the following paragraphs. The findings in the following paragraphs claim that individuals who develop leaders have to create safe environments to assist emerging and existing leaders thrive as individuals so that as business leaders in resilience to affect productivity and sustainability.

Continue reading ““Conceptual Frameworks and Research Models on Resilience in Leadership” by Jesse Ledesma”

A conceptual framework for developing sociotechnical transportation system resilience

electricity.contributor.consultant Amekudzi-Kennedy, Adjo
electricity.contributor.author Amoaning-Yankson, Stephanie
electricity.date.accessioned 2019-01-16T17:19:45Z
electricity.date.available 2019-01-16T17:19:45Z
electricity.date.produced 2017-12
electricity.date.issued 2017-08-25
electricity.date.posted December 2017
electricity.identifier.uri http://high-density lipoprotein.handle.internet/1853/60663
electricity.description.abstract Natural disaster statistics worldwide indicate an upward trend in the amount of reported disasters. Around 2000 alone, there have been over 500 reported disasters, which caused a minimum of ten fatalities affected 100 or even more people and needed worldwide assistance or known as for any condition of emergency. Based on the Worldwide Federation of Red Mix and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), between 1991 and 2000, typically 211 million people was either affected or died from the natural disaster. In that same decade, typically 1,300 people was wiped out around the globe each week. Such disasters are not only seen a humanitarian issue, but additionally a fiscal one and also have a significant effect on the united states economy. For instance, between 2011 and 2013, transportation taken into account roughly $14.7 billion in disaster relief spending, ranking 4th greatest among 19 departments. Furthermore, Hurricane Sandy’s recovery appropriation amounted to $60 billion. Resilience, ale a method to keep critical functions and stop catastrophic failure throughout a disruption, after which recover quickly, has become more than ever before the main thing on most important infrastructure systems’ discussions. A consensus has emerged among relevant stakeholders on the requirement for evolving lengthy-standing planning approaches and operational methods into approaches with increased resilient outcomes. The main purpose of these studies would be to therefore create a framework for transportation system resilience planning that expands current transport resilience approaches using a sociotechnical systems approach, one which views human and business factors additionally to technical factors for system performance. To build up the framework, these studies adopts an inductive and multimethod approach. Information is systematically collected and examined in 2 primary phases. The very first phase starts with an in-depth literature review and synthesis of transportation resilience in addition to resilience theory and it is applications towards the built atmosphere, social systems, economic systems and environmental systems. Next, market research of selected transportation agencies is carried out to review resilience capacity building at transport agencies to be able to extract an evolving maturity process to handle hazards and building system resilience using sociotechnical factors. The 2nd phase of the research then combines key concepts obtained from the resilience literature and also the outcomes of laptop computer to build up the sociotechnical transportation resilience conceptual and planning framework. The framework will be verified and shown using specialist reviews. Findings in the research reveal that the concepts of stability at multiple equilibria present in environmental resilience present possibilities for expanding the present paradigm of transportation resilience thinking, evolving it in one according to single-equilibrium stability to multiple equilibria stability. The resultant framework, according to both resilience literature and survey results, characterizes the relative amounts of four kinds of transport agency capital (business, institutional, technical and financial capital) that lead to sociotechnical system resilience and catalogues attribute-based techniques for developing resilience capacity systematically. These studies plays a role in transportation resilience understanding by extending the present paradigm of transportation system resilience planning from what single equilibrium conceptualization to multiple equilibria conceptualization. The study also characterizes different developmental stages of creating transport resilience capacity utilizing a sociotechnical approach. Finally, the resulting framework is really a potentially advantageous tool for transportation decision makers involved with proper or lengthy-term resilience planning.
electricity.format.mimetype application/pdf
electricity.language.iso en_US
electricity.writer Georgia Institute of Technology
electricity.subject Transportation resilience
electricity.subject System resilience
electricity.subject Sociotechnical resilience
electricity.subject Resilience
electricity.title A conceptual framework for developing sociotechnical transportation system resilience
electricity.type Dissertation
electricity.description.degree Ph.D.

Continue reading “A conceptual framework for developing sociotechnical transportation system resilience”